The Catholic Church's Response to Our Critique of Christian Credibility Because Christianity offers the second-most credible claim of any world religion, we opted to provide its most traditional branch -- the Catholic Church -- with an opportunity to respond to some of our critical observations.
This book speaks to a King and his Kingdom. The author makes reference to several prophecies approximately 50 direct quotes and 75 allusions according to Barbeiri and Senior of the coming King and Kingdom, one universally mentioned quoting from Isaiah the prophet who himself prophesied during the reign of four kings of Judah, the fulfillment of this prophesy is recorded in the first chapter of Mathew, which spoke of Emmanuel, as was foretold in Isaiah 7: The aim of presenting Jesus as the Son of David and not only the Messiah came out in chapter 1 recount of the genealogies.
It also believed that Matthew favoured Isaiah quoting several text from the book according to the Belgian scholar Frans Van Segbroeck 15 and Who is the Author?
It is strongly argued that the first book of the New Testament was written by a Galilean Jew one of the twelve disciples to the Jewish population with expressed purpose of presenting Jesus Christ and the kingdom of God.
Yet, extensively scholarly writings dispute the authorship of the first gospel. Inquisitorially commenting, how could a tax collector or publican like Matthew author this book?
Would he have sufficient education to write? This question and doubt maybe substantiated with his entry into the writings not until chapter 9 of the book. In determining the authorship we scrutinize suggestions provided outside the book and within the book external and internal evidences.
External Evidence The date and time of the writing of this canonized book is hotly disputed as sceptics of prophesy believed it was written around AD 70, others with cited references to the temple being destroyed believe it was prior to AD 70 and that the record of the destruction of the temple was prophetic, relating the incumbent dome to the temple.
Early church fathers namely: Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons concurred that the original Aramaic script was written by the Galilean and tax collector Matthew, who brought the gospel to the Hebrew- Palestinian Jews in the times when Peter and Paul were founding the churches in Rome. These early Aramaic recording nonetheless cannot be found and the Hebrew version of the book seems not to be translated from the Aramaic version.
However, no other authors were named except Matthew, all others possible authors mentioned remain nameless, and to date there has been no other assigned name to the book Barbieri Though the Jews spoke Aramaic they had a literary understanding of Hebrew and therefore Matthew brought them the gospel in their native tongue Barbieri informs that Eusebius, H.
Origen as quoted by Eusebius, H. Others thought Matthew was a prolific writer and therefore wrote originally in Aramaic and then in Greek but was skilled in the Semitic language not to allow the current readers to recognize this.
Internal Evidence The scripture are inerrant in that they were inspired by God, however, God allowed the writers to use their experience and knowledge in articulating the words for example Paul writing of the epistles was borne out of his prison encounter, he made other valuable references based on his experience at sea, likewise Matthew being knowledgeable with financial matters made several references to this in these scripture verses: He had according to Barbierithe most reference to coins when compared to the other gospel writers.
Three significant mentions not found in other gospels are Matthew His quotes from the OT could be used as evidence of his knowledge of the Jewish teaching and his ability to have written like he did as it to relates to the typology presented throughout the book.
Opposed to the evidence With all these evidences various rationalistic critics and scholars categorically reject the apostolic authorship of this gospel among them are Davidson; Julicher and Baljon.
Their reasons for rejecting it are the following: Many conferring the book was originally written in Hebrew to the Jewish populous and is not a translation.
It is commonly purported that nonetheless that Mark wrote the first book, and that Matthew wrote based on the writings of Mark Senior The arguments continue to substantiate Matthew not being the original brain of the book, as some scholar suggest he read the writings of Mark the Quelle, or the Q document, then made additions to the book, thereby expanding thoughts not expounded by Mark Barbieri and Keener, Mentioned in the book were discourses about the Sabbath, the laws, temple, and members of different Jewish sects- Sadducees and Pharisees.
The Jews believed and practiced the laws, hence Matthew himself being a Jew could present arguments which would be clearly understood by his audience.
The Sermon on the Mount, Matthew 5, informs that Jesus was not come to abolish or destroy the law but to fulfil it. However, the several references of the law indicate that the persons to whom Matthew wrote understood the law and were ardent in the practice of the law.
In that time the Jews would have been the ones based on their Israelite background to be most knowledgeable of the law. Once should note nonetheless that there were different sects of the Jews present- Scribes and Pharisees Matthew 5 and 12Sadducees Matthew 16 Senior 21 and Sim Sociopolitical economic condition of the Gospel Matthew The book of Matthew was written towards the closing of the Roman Empire.
Julius Caesar the adopted son of Augustus formerly Actavian. After the birth of Jesus the eastern parts of the Roman Empire flourished economically has was beginning to have great political influence and importance to the Romans.The second year of Jesus' ministry is sometimes referred to as the "Year of Popularity." He performed many miracles during this phase of his ministry and became increasingly popular.
This essay attempts to answer Mary Magdalene’s transformation and her devotion to Jesus during the Galilean ministry, entering Jerusalem, to the cross and at the tomb.
The reader will experience the grief of the followers of Jesus as they hover around the cross. Describe the private Galilean ministry of Jesus to His disciples. Explain the importance of Peter's recognition of Jesus as the Messiah. The Transfiguration; Describe the events of the Transfiguration.
Public Ministry in Judea and Peria; Categorize the problems encountered during Jesus' later Judean ministry. Essay BA-Opposition; Categorize . Open Document. Below is an essay on "The Galilean Ministry of Jesus" from Anti Essays, your source for research papers, essays, and term paper examples.
Essay Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John Theocentric Studies-Part I February 2, The four Gospels are neither histories of the life of Christ nor biographies. Only Matthew and Luke tell of the Birth and childhood of Jesus Matthew and Mark dwell on the Galilean Ministry; Luke, the Perean; John, the Judean.
John omits most of the Galilean. Galilean Ministry November 23, by admin 1 Comment After John (the Baptist) was arrested, Jesus went to Galilee, preaching the good news of God: “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God has come near.